Mr Calcu | Make smarter academic choices by analyzing professors’ strengths across teaching, research, and clarity—instantly.

Discover and compare professor performance with precision. Uncover hidden strengths, boost academic success, and empower data-driven decisions.

Professor Rating Analyzer

Professor Rating Analyzer Guidelines

You’ve got this! Follow these quick steps to get reliable, actionable results:

Usage Guidelines

  • Rate each criterion between 0 and 5. Decimal values (e.g., 4.3) are supported.
  • Lower workload values are preferred. The formula uses (5 − W) for fairness.
  • Teaching and Clarity are distinct; don’t assume correlation.
  • Review detailed output to understand how each component contributes.
  • Out-of-range inputs (negative or over 5) will be rejected.

Formula Recap

S = 0.4×T + 0.3×R + 0.2×C + 0.1×(5 − W)

Use current academic term data for accurate evaluations.

Professor Rating Analyzer Description

Understanding Professor Ratings

The Professor Rating Analyzer uses a weighted scoring model to assess faculty performance based on four key criteria:

  • Teaching Effectiveness (T) – Quality of instruction and student engagement
  • Research Impact (R) – Publications, innovation, and academic contribution
  • Course Clarity (C) – Organization of course content and expectations
  • Workload Management (W) – Student workload perception (lower is better)

Scoring Formula

Each metric is rated from 0 to 5. The overall score is calculated using:

Overall Score (S) = 0.4×T + 0.3×R + 0.2×C + 0.1×(5 − W)

The workload is inverted because a lower workload means better student experience.

Edge Cases Explained

  • All Zeros: If all scores are 0, total score = 0
  • Perfect Inputs: All metrics = 5, W = 0 ⇒ S = 5 (100%)
  • Strong Teaching, Weak Research: T=5, R=1, C=5, W=1 → S = 3.7 (74%)
  • High Workload Impact: W=5 nullifies workload credit → S drops even with strong metrics
  • Invalid Inputs: Values outside 0–5 are rejected

Case Studies

Dr. Alvarez – Balanced Performer

  • Teaching: 4.7
  • Research: 4.0
  • Clarity: 4.3
  • Workload: 2.0
S = 0.4×4.7 + 0.3×4.0 + 0.2×4.3 + 0.1×(5−2.0) = 4.24 → 84.8%

Rating: Good

Dr. Patel – Research-Heavy but Inefficient Communicator

  • Teaching: 2.5
  • Research: 5.0
  • Clarity: 2.0
  • Workload: 4.5
S = 0.4×2.5 + 0.3×5.0 + 0.2×2.0 + 0.1×(5−4.5) = 2.95 → 59%

Rating: Needs Improvement

Start using the analyzer now to choose the best-fit professors and shape your academic success with confidence.

Example Calculation

Detailed Calculation Table

CriterionWeightYour ScoreWeighted Contribution
Teaching Effectiveness40%4.21.68
Research Impact30%3.81.14
Course Clarity20%4.00.80
Workload (Inverted)10%3.50.15 (5 − 3.5)
Total Score3.77 → 75.4%

Performance Ratings

Overall RatingScore Range
Excellent85 – 100
Good70 – 84
Needs ImprovementBelow 70

Frequently Asked Questions

The overall rating is computed using weighted scores: 40% teaching, 30% research, 20% clarity, and 10% for workload (inverted).

Ratings are on a scale from 0 to 5, where higher values generally indicate better performance, except for workload.

Yes, the tool allows for periodic updates to reflect recent performance changes.

A lower workload rating indicates better management, so the formula inverts it to reward lighter student load (5 − W).

The high workload (W=5) nullifies the 10% weight allocated to that category, potentially reducing a perfect score to 90.

No. Ratings must be between 0 and 5. The system auto-rejects or truncates invalid entries.

Yes. One may excel in teaching while another in research, but achieve a similar total due to balanced weights.

An 'excellent' rating typically requires scores of 4.5+ across all criteria and a low workload rating (W < 2).

Our Other Tools